Washington Times

The Right Questions
Washington Times Commentary
by Frank J. Gaffney Jr. 

February 3, 2004 -- President Bush has reportedly decided, wisely, to accept the inevitable and endorse the creation of yet another blue ribbon bipartisan commission. Consequently, we will soon have a new group of worthies examining highly classified information about what we thought we knew about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and, if we were wrong, why. 

The commission's mandate should also require it to address one other, related and very important topic: Was Saddam Hussein's Iraq involved in previous terrorist attacks against the United States? 

These questions take on all the more importance insofar as preliminary answers are already available. Two intrepid women, Mideast expert Laurie Mylroie and former TV journalist Jayna Davis, have devoted much of their lives to documenting evidence of Iraqi complicity in two of the most deadly attacks in the nation's history. 

The need to get to the bottom of apparent Iraqi complicity in attacks on the American homeland is even more apparent in a new book by Ms. Davis titled "The Third Terrorist: The Middle Eastern Connection to the Oklahoma City Bombing," to be published next month by WND/Thomas Nelson Publishers. 
Full Story

Lurking in the Jayna Davis Files 
Washington Times Commentary 
By FRANK J. GAFFNEY JR. 

November 19, 2002 -- Suffice it to say there is evidence of Iraqi involvement in at least one and perhaps all three of most deadly terrorist attacks in the United States to date….That record includes the impressive investigative research conducted by Jayna Davis, a former reporter with Oklahoma City's KFOR television station. Since the Murrah Building was destroyed in April 1995, Miss Davis has been tirelessly collecting, sifting and analyzing evidence (including some 80 pages of affidavits from more than 20 eyewitnesses and 2,000 supporting documents) of precisely the sort that the CIA says does not exist.
Full Story

Frank J. Gaffney Jr. is the president of the Center for Security Policy and a columnist for The Washington Times.  resume for Frank Gaffney

 

Bush's hour to shine
Frank J. Gaffney Jr.  January 28, 2003

     President Bush has been getting a lot of free advice lately about what he should say in his State of the Union address tomorrow night. Here is the Center for Security Policy's contribution:
     My fellow Americans: Tonight, it is my solemn responsibility to describe for you an unacceptably grave risk to our national security — and what we are going to do about it.
     For 17 months, we have been waging a war on terror, a defensive response to a scurrilous attack that caused the premeditated death of thousands of our countrymen. We have struck at the al Qaeda network that was most immediately involved in carrying out the September 11 hijackings.
     All over the world, operatives of this Islamist terror organization are today being sought, apprehended or killed in the hope of preventing further, and possibly far more destructive, attacks upon us, our allies or our vital interests.
     Indispensable to that effort has been our campaign to deny al Qaeda the logistical support, training facilities and safe haven they once enjoyed in Afghanistan. In the process, thanks to the skill, courage and sacrifice of our armed forces and intelligence services, we have helped to liberate the Afghan people and to offer them an opportunity rarely known to their long-suffering nation for representative self-governance, political freedom and economic opportunity.
     We have reason to believe, however, that another government played an indispensable role in planning, facilitating and executing the September 11 attacks: Saddam Hussein's regime in Iraq. Unfortunately, at the moment the evidence of this involvement is circumstantial and less than clear-cut.
     The case for implicating Saddam and his operatives in the latest and most deadly attack upon us is even more compelling, though, when added to evidence that points to his complicity in earlier terrorist acts — the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center and the 1996 bombing of the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. Tonight, sitting with the first lady, are two intrepid women who have done pioneering work ferreting out and calling attention to this evidence: an internationally recognized specialist on Iraq and best-selling author, Dr. Laurie Mylroie, and television-reporter-turned-independent investigator, Jayna Davis of Oklahoma City. I would ask you to join me in saluting them for pursuing leads that neither the federal government, prosecutors or the media have done enough to date to investigate.
     My administration is working to correct this shortfall and to learn all we can — to connect the dots — between Saddam's sponsorship of terror, his oft-stated desire for revenge and the actions of others, be they followers of a blind sheik, disaffected American "militiamen" or al Qaeda operatives. We will probably not know the full truth about the Iraqi connection, however, until Iraq is liberated as Afghanistan has been, and the secrets of the former's brutal regime are brought to light.
     What we do know already is that it would be irresponsible to afford Saddam Hussein an opportunity to attack again, either directly or through cut-outs. This is particularly true since the next attack may well involve the use of weapons of mass destruction on our soil or overseas. This danger exists because Saddam has assiduously pursued the production and stockpiling of such weapons and continues to violate international commitments and U.N. Security Council resolutions requiring him to disarm.
     We also know the only effective way to ensure such disarmament — and the only hope it will not be followed by a covert Iraqi rearmament — is to liberate Iraq from Saddam's brutal misrule. Affording more time for inspections that are not disarming Iraq and that, even if they were, would not in and of themselves preclude Saddam from subsequently rearming, would do nothing to prevent him from engaging in further acts of terror against us. To the contrary, additional weeks or months may well provide just the opportunity he needs to exercise a monstrously lethal strike.
     In the hope of preventing such a possibility, with the intention of advancing regional and world peace and with a determination to liberate the Iraqi people, I have ordered the United States military at this hour to launch operations aimed at removing Saddam Hussein and his regime from power. As they do so, they will be accompanied and facilitated in their campaign by a number of other nations' combat units joining ours in operating from foreign bases and, with permission, through foreign airspace.
     The speed and cost of this operation will ultimately be decided by the help we receive from those who have at least as much interest as we in ending Saddam's malevolence — his own people — as by the skillful employment of our weaponry. We will work with the opposition to build a new, free and prosperous Iraq, a model for the region and the world.
     My report to you tonight is that we have acted, as we must, to defend our vital interests. We are doing so in a way that will minimize the threats now confronting us, that holds out hope for a more peaceful and secure world and that will enhance the state of our Union. God bless America.

 

~ top ~